Articles Posted in White Collar Crimes

Yesterday, we began our discussion about the Littleton coach (hereinafter, the “Defendant”) who had apparently lied before a Grand Jury when summoned to testify in connection with an ongoing Middlesex County rape investigation.

As we discussed, and it certainly deserves repeating, lying to authorities about an ongoing investigation, either under oath or not, is a crime. The only thing that changes is which crime it is going to be.

In this case, the apparent lies were spoken under oath. In the Grand Jury, witnesses are sworn in and questioned by a prosecutor about whatever is being investigated. To lie while under oath is the crime of perjury.

The Defendant was questioned about, among other things, whether he had committed certain crimes such as providing alcohol to minors. He denied having done so.
The government decided that the Defendant had committed perjury because his testimony, albeit self-serving, was contradicted by other witnesses.

To me, this brings about a couple of troubling questions.
Continue reading

As Boston’s White Collar Crime Convicted Ex City Councilman Chuck Turner goes off anything-but- quietly into the federal sunset for three years, the state government’s sites now turn south.

Now, Gina Clark, the controversial founder of the defunct Cape Cod charity Touched by Angels is in the prosecutorial sites. A Barnstable County grand jury has indicted Ms. Clark (hereinafter, the “Defendant”) . She is charged with good old Massachusetts larceny, fraud, and associated charges, according to the Commonwealth.

The Commonwealth alleges that the Defendant stole tens of thousands of dollars from the charity, which was organized to provide financial help to families who had lost loved ones or who were dealing with medical problems.

“These families were targeted by this defendant and sought her help after going through truly traumatic circumstances, either losing a family member or dealing with serious medical conditions,” Attorney General Martha Coakley said in a statement. “By promising these victims financial support and then keeping the money for herself, we allege that this defendant stole tens of thousands of dollars from families in need.”
Continue reading

This week has not been a good one as far as the reputation of “higher learning” is concerned…and, for once, it had nothing to do with either drugs or bullying!

First of all, there is the case of Falmouth’s own Luk Van Parijs (hereinafter, “Penalized Prof.”, who has just pleaded guilty in Boston’s federal court to white collar crimes.

Penalized Prof. Is a 40-year-old former associate professor of biology from MIT. He was fired in 2005 for falsifying data in scientific papers. The papers concerned experimentation about generating a transgenic mouse in his lab. The charge was making a false statement in a federal research grant application, the US Attorney’s Office said. He is due to be sentenced in June. He faces the potential of five years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a $250,000 fine.

In 2009, Penalized Prof.’s career began to unravel when the federal Office of Research Integrity found that he had engaged in scientific misconduct by submitting the false data in numerous grant applications. He was also found to have falsified data in numerous scientific publications and presentations and one book chapter.

MIT’s embarrassment was shared today by a local law school today as well. Well, at least a student is embarrassed. And that’s the least of his problems now.

John Ethan Cassidy, a 26-year-old University of Massachusetts School of Law student (hereinafter, “Legal Gunner”) was arraigned today on a variety of firearms charges for allegedly possessing an AK-47 assault rifle and a 9mm pistol, Dartmouth police said. He was arrested yesterday evening as he left the school.

Legal Gunner had moved to the area in August 2010, police said in a statement. He was originally from Spring, Texas. Unfortunately, he was apparently also wanted on a warrant from that state. Law enforcement says he will also face charges at a later date of assaulting his roommate. The guns were apparently uncovered, along with large-capacity magazines and several hundred rounds of ammunition in his apartment.
Continue reading

Chuck Turner (hereinafter, the “Defendant”) faced the federal judge yesterday. Finally, after listening to lord knows how many hours from the Defendant, the judge got to have his say. It was sentencing day for the Defendant. The final act of the recent federal trial during which a jury found him guilty of white collar crmes

The defense argued for leniency for the 70-year-old civil rights crusader. They pointed to his four decades of service as a community activist and elected official…aside from whatever other corruption one might assume took place during those years. They appealed to the court to give the Defendant probation, allowing him to avoid obligatory government housing altogether.

The prosecutors suggested a prison term of 33 to 41 months. They argued that the Defendant lied on the witness stand (aka perjury) and that he made a mockery of public office and the criminal justice system.

The Defendant was convicted in October of attempted extortion and three counts of providing false statements to FBI agents. He protested his innocence then and does so now. He blames his conviction on a government conspiracy to discredit elected officials of African-American descent.
Continue reading

Former Massachusetts State Senator Dianne Wilkerson has been sentenced to serve 3 ½ years in state prison for accepting $23,500 in bribes. Wilkerson had pleaded guilty to criminal charges of eight counts of attempted extortion last year.

In 2008, she was caught inserting $100 bills in her bra as part of a kickback scam. Wilkerson was accused of taking eight cash payments between 2007 and 2008 from undercover agents and a witness who was secretly working with the FBI. The former state senator was captured on approximately 150 video and audio recordings saying she was going to use some of the money at a casino, as well as to embark upon a sticker campaign in the wake of losing the 2008 Democratic primary.

While prosecutors had pushed for Wilkerson be sentenced to four years in prison, her legal team had argued for less time. The sentence that Wilkerson received is in line with federal sentencing guidelines.

The former state senator, who has been ordered to turn herself in on March 11 so she can start serving her federal prison term, said today that the believes that she was pursued by corrupt federal prosecutors who didn’t like the fact that she was among the politicians that challenged the status quo. Originally, Wilkerson had faced 32 charges of allegedly taking bribes, but the government agreed to drop 24 of the criminal charges. Mail fraud and wire fraud and conspiring to extort cash were among the charges.

Wilkerson sentenced to 3 1/2 years in corruption case, Boston.com, January 6, 2011
Wilkerson guilty of attempted extortion; prosecutors recommend up to 4 years, Boston.com, June 3, 2010

Related Web Resources:
White-Collar Crime, Federal Bureau of Investigation
White-Collar Crime: an overview, Cornell University Law School Continue reading

I am often asked whether Massachusetts prosecutors and judges are more lenient during the holiday season. The answer is like most answers in human events…it depends. As we end the year in which various unlikely Massachusetts criminal defendants have faced “Justice” at the bar, it is worth seeing what sentences have been coming down in cases ranging from fraud, to bribery, to sexual assault…and beyond.

Today, let’s look at an on-going sentencing struggle in federal court. it is the case in which the fate of former state senator Dianne Wilkerson is still being battered about like a piñata although she pleaded guilty months ago. As I have mentioned in the past, federal sentencing is a complicated process, complete with its own book of rules and guidelines as well as the consideration of virtually anything under the sun including the alleged existence of potential uncharged crimes.

Ms. Dickerson was supposed to be sentenced this week pursuant to her plea bargain. However, a hearing as to new allegations (supposedly committed long before her plea bargain) was held. At the hearing, the court heard testimony from a Dorchester businessman that Ms. Dickerson had pressured him to pay her several thousand dollars from 2002 to 2006 to help relieve her financial problems and that he complied because he thought it would give his multimillion-dollar development proposal in her district a boost.

“I felt it couldn’t hurt me in moving my project along,” testified businessman Azid Mohammed, who prosecutors say paid Wilkerson $6,700 in checks and cash. He testified in US District Court during an unusual evidentiary hearing that sets the stage for Wilkerson’s sentencing next month in a bribery case. But he added, “No, I didn’t want to make those payments.”

By the way, in case you are wondering, there is no news of his being charged with anything such as offering or paying the bribe..
Continue reading

A disciplinary hearing is being conducted by the Boston City Council today during which Chuck Turner, who has represented Roxbury, is expected to be ousted.

Last month, Turner was convicted in federal court of attempted extortion and providing false statements to FBI agents. The dramatic trial featured a video , testimony and cross-examination of the Councilor, and a shouting confrontation between the U.S. Attorney and a key government witness. Prosecutors had alleged that Turner accepted money to help Ronald Wilburn, a Boston business man cooperating with the FBI, to get a liquor license. Turner is to be sentenced on January 25, and prosecutors haven’t disclosed what they will recommend. In the meantime, the City Council could expel Turner by a 2/3 vote at today’s disciplinary hearing. Six councilors have already stated that they will vote for removal, and 8 will be enough for expulsion. If it goes through, the expulsion will be effective Friday.

This is a high-profile example of how a criminal conviction can wreak havoc on a person’s future and reputation. Although Turner worked in public service for more than a decade, he could now suffer the humiliation of being the first member removed from office in the 100-year history of the City Council. Under state law, the conviction will force him to forfeit his city pension. If expelled, he could also lose his biweekly paycheck. This will all be in addition to his ultimate sentence, which could be up to 20 years for the extortion charge and up to 5 years each for the false statement charges.

If you have been charged with a crime, you need to hire an excellent defense attorney to protect not only your liberty but also your name, career and future.

Sources:

The Boston Globe: Turner’s City Council career expected to end later today

The Boston Globe: Boston Councilor Chuck Turner convicted on all counts in corruption case
Continue reading

Former Massachusetts state senator Dianne Wilkerson is expected to receive her sentence date this week. Wilkerson pleaded guilty in June to eight counts of attempted extortion after she was caught on tape stuffing bribe money into her shirt and accused of taking $23,500 in bribes. She allegedly took eight cash payments from undercover FBI agents and a witness cooperating with the FBI in 2007 and 2008.

Prosecutors told the Boston Globe that they plan to ask for a four-year sentence, while Wilkerson’s lawyers have said that they plan to ask for less than the three years and two months suggested as the minimum in federal sentencing guidelines. They hope that the judge considers Wilkerson’s years of public service. The case’s status conference was scheduled for today by U.S. District Judge Douglas Woodluck.

When the judge ultimately determines Wilkerson’s sentence, he will likely consider her years of public service as her defense counsel hopes because 18 U.S.C. § 3553 requires judges to consider the history and characteristics of the defendant as well as the nature of the offense, the kinds of sentences available, the applicable sentencing range, and the need to avoid unwarranted sentence differences between defendants with similar records who’ve been found guilty of similar offenses. However, Wilkerson’s lawyers’ hope for a sentence less than the suggested minimum might be difficult to realize because statistically judges follow the sentencing guidelines(or depart from them at the request of prosecutors) in 85% of cases.

There are several possible reasons why judges follow these guidelines in such a substantial amount of cases. First of all, from 1987 through 2005 the “guidelines” were not really guidelines at all and were mandatory. The purpose was uniformity, but the problem was, among other things, inflexibility. In 2005, the United States Supreme Court held that mandatory guidelines violate the 6th Amendment, and now they are simply advisory. Nevertheless, a potential reason why judges follow them so often is that most of them were appointed since 1987 and have known nothing else. Secondly, judges might fear reversal. Finally, they might fear that if they depart from the guidelines, Congress might cabin their discretion even more than before. In light of all of this, it will be interesting to see whether the judge departs from the suggested minimum at the request of Wilkerson’s defense lawyers.

Sources: The Boston Globe, Judge to set Wilkerson’s sentencing date; The Boston Globe, Wilkerson admits she took $23,500
Continue reading

As the Chuck Turner trial churns on, other white collar crimes are being investigated in the Commonwealth of Mass. The potential defendants include folks from all backgrounds…even the mentally impaired.

Let’s turn to the town of Lowell. On Tuesday, staff at a local bank suddenly became suspicious when they came upon a rather unusual bill.

What was strange was the amount of the bill. It was a $10,000 bill.

Unless the bearer of the bill (hereinafter, the “Bearer”) had been saving the bill for a very long time, it was clear that the bill was false. You see, it would appear that such bills were released in a very limited amount back in the 1930’s.

The bills are no longer in circulation.
Continue reading

The federal white collar trial for City Councilor Chuck Turner is set to begin today. Already, the human drama and strategic dances have begun and nary a juror has been selected (or rejected) yet.

And, actually, that’s the way it should be.

The trend is for courts to try to avoid any last minute surprises during the trial. The issue presenting itself here is regarding one of the main witnesses against Mr. Turner.

As you may recall, charges were brought against Turner and, in a related matter, Diane Wilkerson for corruption. For his part, Turner is accused with accepting a bribe. In fact, the United States Attorney claims that there is video showing Turner accepting the bribe from Ron Wilburn, a businessman (hereinafter, the “Witness”) trying to get a liquor license. During the investigation, the F.B.I. claims that Turner lied to them about the events.

The Witness is now apparently claiming his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, trying to refuse to testify. This, of course, means that he has broken any agreement he might have had with the prosecution and may be looking at imprisonment himself.

No word from Ms. Wilkerson who has already pleaded guilty, but who’s sentencing is still pending.
Continue reading

Contact Information