18-Year-Old Lynn Man Faces Criminal Charges For Weapons...To Wit: Explosives – Attorney Sam’s Take
Recently, I was discussing a case with a client who was charged with possessing drugs with the intent to distribute in a school zone. It became clear that he had suddenly come into contact with the need to express a certain confusion.
It happened just after I explained to him, once again, that the School Zone count carried a mandatory minimum sentence of two years.
“Yeah, but they can’t send me to jail, even if convicted”, opined “Client X” (just think of him as a police officer who shot someone. They’re names are never revealed).
I asked him for the reasoning behind this legal opinion and he explained that he had a clean record and so, somehow, the mandatory minimum did not apply to him. I then reminded him that his record was far from clean. True, he had no prior convictions, but he had two pages of previous cases which had ended short of convictions, such as dismissals and a Continuance Without A Finding. Most of these cases, by the way had been drug cases.
“Ok”, he explained , moving happily along to Theory “B”, “but none of those cases involved this particular drug that they are charging me with now.”
The conversation became less happy when I explained that this did not really matter. In the vernacular, “drugs is drugs”. Particularly when the allegation is that you are selling them.
It is because of such misconceptions by those not trained in the law that I address today’s story.